Saturday, February 01, 2025
NOTE: As part of any organizations ERM program, changes in the political and regulatory environment can pose new risks or change the risk profile for an organization. With that in mind, I will be tackling these subjects from a neutral ERM perspective on how a risk manager should examine these changing risks thinking about the hazard, operational, financial, and strategic risks they may impact. The goal for every organization should be to reduce uncertainty in achieving its objectives (ISO 31000 definition of risk). This can be done by having a comprehensive enterprise risk management program in place.
Recent immigration enforcement measures have sparked vigorous debates about national security, economic growth, and labor market dynamics. However, beyond the intended policy goals, there exist significant unintended consequences—most notably, the absenteeism of migrant workers due to fear of deportation. From an enterprise risk management (ERM) perspective, these consequences pose hazard, operational, financial, and strategic risks that affect not only immigrant labor sectors like agriculture but also the broader U.S. economy, including American workers. In this article, we expand on these risks and incorporate insights from a Cato Institute analysis, which argues that aggressive deportation policies may ultimately harm American workers as well.
1. Hazard Risk: An Environment of Uncertainty and Fear
The Unseen Threat:
Hazard risk in the context of immigration enforcement refers to the external, uncontrollable factors that disrupt business operations. Heightened deportation efforts create a pervasive atmosphere of fear among migrant communities. This fear is not only about the risk of deportation itself but also about the constant possibility of sudden enforcement actions.
Implications for Business and Workers:
- Regulatory Volatility: Businesses operating in sectors reliant on immigrant labor, such as agriculture, hospitality, and construction, face regulatory risks as policies shift abruptly. This instability forces companies to continually adapt their compliance measures.
- Widespread Fear: The fear of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) raids extends beyond undocumented workers to legal immigrants and even U.S. citizens associated with these communities. As the Cato Institute points out, the chilling effect of such policies can reduce overall workforce participation, exacerbating labor shortages that affect all workers, including Americans.
2. Operational Risk: Disruptions Due to Workforce Absenteeism
The Impact on Daily Operations:
Operational risk concerns the interruptions in day-to-day business processes. When migrant workers stay away from work—whether due to deportation, fear, or uncertainty—the reliability and efficiency of critical operations are compromised.
Key Operational Challenges:
- Labor Shortages: As migrant workers increasingly avoid workplaces to dodge potential ICE encounters, industries such as agriculture experience acute labor shortages. This not only slows production but also delays seasonal activities that have tight deadlines.
- Continuity Issues: Reduced worker attendance can disrupt tightly synchronized supply chains. For example, in agriculture, missing the narrow window for harvesting can lead to significant losses, affecting everything from raw produce availability to the subsequent processing and distribution phases.
- Training and Replacement Costs: In an environment of persistent absenteeism, businesses are compelled to invest more in training new workers, often without finding employees with the necessary skills and work ethic. This ongoing cycle adds stress to operational continuity.
3. Financial Risk: Rising Costs and Lower Productivity
Economic Strain from Workforce Instability:
Financial risk in this scenario is largely driven by increased operational costs and lost revenue stemming from labor disruptions. When the workforce is unstable, both the cost structure and the revenue generation of businesses are adversely affected.
Economic Consequences:
- Increased Wage Pressures: With fewer workers available, companies may need to offer higher wages to attract both immigrant and native workers. While this might seem beneficial for workers, it also reduces profit margins for businesses already grappling with other rising costs.
- Productivity Losses: Absenteeism translates directly into lost productivity. In sectors like agriculture, even minor delays can lead to significant crop losses, directly impacting revenues and supply contracts.
- Broader Economic Impacts: As the Cato Institute analysis suggests, reduced labor participation does not only hurt industries relying on immigrant workers—it also hampers the economic prospects of American workers. Labor shortages can lead to increased operational costs, which may be passed on to consumers, thereby contributing to inflation and reducing overall economic competitiveness.
4. Strategic Risk: Long-Term Competitiveness and Market Position
Navigating the Future Amid Workforce Instability:
Strategic risk involves threats to a company’s long-term competitive position. When a business's operational framework is built on a dependable labor force, disruptions caused by aggressive immigration policies can fundamentally weaken that foundation.
Long-Term Implications Include:
- Loss of Institutional Knowledge: Regular turnover or absenteeism among experienced migrant workers results in a significant loss of institutional knowledge. This loss stifles innovation and erodes the efficiency that comes with a stable, skilled workforce.
- Competitive Disadvantage: Industries that face continuous labor disruptions are less competitive on a global scale. As operational costs rise and production schedules falter, companies may find themselves outpaced by competitors in regions with more stable labor forces.
- Market Perception and Investment: Persistent labor issues can tarnish a company’s reputation among investors and consumers alike. Strategic planning becomes more challenging when a business must constantly adapt to external shocks, reducing its ability to invest in growth initiatives or technological innovation.
5. The Broader Picture: Ripple Effects on American Workers and the Economy
The analysis by the Cato Institute underscores a counterintuitive but crucial point: the adverse impacts of aggressive deportation policies extend beyond immigrant communities to affect American workers as well. When the fear of deportation leads to widespread absenteeism among migrant workers, it creates a vacuum in industries that are already struggling to attract native labor. This shortage not only drives up operational costs but also forces businesses to make difficult choices—such as increasing automation or outsourcing production—changes that can disrupt local labor markets and reduce overall job stability.
Wider Economic Consequences:
- Consumer Prices and Inflation: With production bottlenecks in critical sectors like agriculture, reduced output can lead to higher consumer prices. This, in turn, contributes to inflation and erodes purchasing power.
- Economic Growth: A stable, predictable labor force is essential for sustainable economic growth. Workforce instability, driven by immigration enforcement, can stymie innovation and slow economic progress.
- Social Costs: The broader economic slowdown, compounded by increased operational costs for businesses, can lead to higher societal costs. These include greater public spending on social services and a general decline in community well-being, further perpetuating the cycle of economic disruption.
Conclusion
From an enterprise risk management perspective, the unintended consequences of aggressive deportation policies—manifested through migrant workers' absenteeism—pose significant challenges. The resultant hazard, operational, financial, and strategic risks do not exist in isolation; they ripple across the economy, affecting both immigrant-dependent sectors and American workers. As the Cato Institute insightfully argues, policies designed to protect national interests may inadvertently undermine the very labor market stability they aim to secure.
Businesses and policymakers alike must recognize and address these interconnected risks. A balanced approach that considers the immediate operational impacts alongside long-term economic and strategic implications is essential. Only by mitigating these risks can we safeguard both business competitiveness and the broader economic health of the nation.
In our next installment, we will explore potential strategies—from diversified labor sourcing and targeted automation to policy reform—that can help businesses navigate these turbulent times and build a more resilient economic future.
ARM(™) and CPCU ® are trademarks of the American Institute For Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters, d/b/a The Institutes.
Erike Young is a recognized course leader for The Institutes content but not affiliated or associated with The Institutes in any way. The Institutes do not explicitly endorse, approve, or support Erike Young or The Risk Management Study Group’s services, but approve of the use of our materials for educational purposes.